From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5d56b695cd5b394d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-15 05:30:37 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!yama.mcc.ac.uk!cs.man.ac.uk!newshost!bevan
From: bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: An error on my part ... (was Re: Robert Dewar's horrible posts)
Date: 15 Dec 1994 13:30:37 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science; University of Manchester
Message-ID: <BEVAN.94Dec15133037@lemur.cs.man.ac.uk>
References: <3c7ieuINNgnt@marble.summit.novell.com>
 <3ccba1$71n@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
	<BEVAN.94Dec12143317@lemur.cs.man.ac.uk> <D0pw8F.MAv@cwi.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lemur.cs.man.ac.uk
In-reply-to: dik@cwi.nl's message of Mon, 12 Dec 1994 21:41:03 GMT
Date: 1994-12-15T13:30:37+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <D0pw8F.MAv@cwi.nl> dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
   In article <BEVAN.94Dec12143317@lemur.cs.man.ac.uk> bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) writes:
    > In that case it would help if your software generated or at least
    > respected the References line in the header.

   What is wrong with the References line in the header of the article you quote?

I cancelled the post (but apparently not quick enough) once I realised
the the post I was responding to did have a reference line.  Of course
I should have checked before posting.  Instead I incorrectly assumed
it was like some of Robert's past messages which, whilst having plenty
of content, were sometimes difficult to put in context because of the
lack of a References line.