From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ADDR_WS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 20 May 93 16:50:01 GMT
From: agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!mucs!m1!bevan@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU  (Step
hen J Bevan)
Subject: Re: AdaNET (was Re: Electronic copy of LRM)
Message-ID: <BEVAN.93May20175001@tiger.cs.man.ac.uk>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1993May14.231859.18072@source.asset.com> vand@source.asset.com (Lau
rence VanDolsen) writes:
   In article <BEVAN.93May11080744@tiger.cs.man.ac.uk> bevan@tiger.cs.man.ac.uk
 (Stephen J Bevan) writes:

   [all about anonymous ftp]

   Everybody seems to be missing the point.  Keeping track of usage is a
   great deal more than simply having a list of email addresses.  The ASSET
   folks also need to know WHY, WHAT, etc.

Which are all pointless questions if after filling out the forms you
find there is nothing you can make use of in the archive.  


   It is easy to sign up, just send email to beank@source.asset.com
   and ask.  She'll send you the forms.

Maybe, but it still smacks of excessive bureaucracy.  Every other
language archive I know of gets by with anonymous ftp + logging where
necessary.  This "special account" stuff just serves to further
isolate Ada.