From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa2221f5dd5f5100
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-24 11:27:06 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.airnews.net!cabal12.airnews.net!usenet
From: David Gressett <gressett@airmail.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Newbie question about pointers in GNAT 3.15p on Windows 2000
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:25:47 -0600
Organization: Airnews.net! at Internet America
Message-ID: 
 <BE8050F79F024337.84AFC9E0A436E4DE.C8A9D68CA1AFF908@lp.airnews.net>
X-Orig-Message-ID: <qbsk5vk8tjs692tshq4kgfqsd2j8b9g6b4@4ax.com>
References: 
 <816517EFDE1ABFFF.672EFD9C99861B55.1999743ACE4BA64B@lp.airnews.net>
 <mailman.35.1045868531.9948.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <1E8A654E77630350.41A48F3C993019DF.E250C2C648709E88@lp.airnews.net>
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library1-aux.airnews.net
NNTP-Posting-Time: Mon Feb 24 13:25:24 2003
NNTP-Posting-Host: !`(s)1k-XN%>b22 (Encoded at Airnews!)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34530
Date: 2003-02-24T13:25:47-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:05:12 -0600, David Gressett
<gressett@airmail.net> wrote:

>On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:03:14 -0600, "David C. Hoos, Sr."
><david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote:
>
>>"Local" refers to the declarative region of the function X.
>>
>>That the pointer is "non-local" is a consequence of the fact that
>>the pointer _type_ is not in the local region.
>>
>>It's hard to see what is the point of this exercise, since the
>>value of P_Size is not used.  But, in general taking the access of
>>a variable on the stack is not very useful (e.g., to return it as
>>the result of a function), since the local stack variable is subject
>>to corruption upon return from the function.
>
>Thanks.  It's been 2 years since I have done any Ada, and I had
>learned very much the previous time.

Oops -  that should have been " had not learned".
>
>I ran across this while trying to do Windows system calls with the
>Windows binding that comes with the GNAT Windows compiler.