From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,99f33f51845a7793
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-20 12:35:45 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.sttln1.wa.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Mark Lundquist" <up.yerz@nospam.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <3be27344$0$227$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>
 <MRyE7.10079$xS6.13799@www.newsranger.com>
 <x7vofmki7mm.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> <3BE42900.7590E899@adaworks.com>
 <3be65f4c$0$237$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>
 <tuoetohbaump12@corp.supernews.com> <x7vu1w2bil4.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <tuvpi2sl62cbdf@corp.supernews.com> <x7vy9lbxih0.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <tv55kecu56i1f@corp.supernews.com> <x7vu1vv6b02.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <3BF6E4DF.FA47ACDB@adaworks.com> <x7vd72gi0zm.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <tvi8pl3ebdgqb2@corp.supernews.com> <3BF93F0F.D5E4D0B7@Raytheon.com>
 <u3d3aeavn.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <3BFA6BDC.26E7557E@Raytheon.com>
 <3bfa84ca$0$8514$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>
Subject: Re: 'withing' problem [code generation]
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <B8zK7.51483$XJ4.30270717@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:35:45 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.248.56.237
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news1.sttln1.wa.home.com 1006288545 24.248.56.237 (Tue,
 20 Nov 2001 12:35:45 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:35:45 PST
Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16752
Date: 2001-11-20T20:35:45+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"David Crocker" <dcrocker@imsltd.com> wrote in message
news:3bfa84ca$0$8514$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net...
>
> The nicest solution is the one used by Java (and by our own product) - no
> restriction at all on forward referencing classes/types, or on packages
> referring to each other (except for absurd cases like 2 classes inheriting
> from each other). This is the way all programming languages should go,
IMO.

OK -- but isn't Java's solution more of just a side-benefit of being a
by-reference language?

It seems like there are some underlying trade-offs :-)

Cheers,
-- Mark Lundquist
http://members.home.com/mlundquist2/consulting