From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,915d37e7b8e0ec69 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: and visual library once again Date: 21 Oct 2005 08:48:37 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <4357E40B.1050705@obry.net> <1129861178.782874.87870@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1129902433 30317 192.135.80.34 (21 Oct 2005 13:47:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5850 Date: 2005-10-21T08:48:37-05:00 List-Id: In article , Szymon Guz writes: >>>But it is important to remind anyone asking such a question that they >>>can sell the program ONLY if they give a copy of the source code to the= > >>>customer they sell it to (including the right of that customer to give >>>the source and binary to anyone else they want per the GPL). That's a >>>pretty big difference for most people who "sell their programs". It can= > >>>lead to the immediate termination of your ability to sell any other >>>copies of the program to anyone else in many markets. >>=20 >>=20 >> It is not a problem for anyone who actually sells their software. >>=20 >> It is a problem for those who follow the customary practice of >> Microsoft, Symantec, Computer Associates and actually _license_ >> their software rather than selling it. > > do you mean that this is a bad practice ? I mean the (presumed) practice of denizens of comp.lang.ada saying "sell my software" when they really mean "license my software" is certainly bad. But I suppose this meta-interchange is good, proving once again that English is not a strongly typed language. The Truth will set you Free.