From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_WORDY, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4eb65fab6deaa097 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Ken Garlington" Subject: Re: Lack of Mature Tools (was: Lockheed Martin, Green Hills, etc.) Date: 2000/05/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 618935858 References: <87aeidsgr8.fsf@think.mihalis.net> <8ep009$is3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net X-Trace: news.flash.net 957400096 216.215.81.119 (Wed, 03 May 2000 19:28:16 CDT) Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 19:28:16 CDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Matthew Woodcraft" wrote in message news:jhi*wLbro@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk... > >The point is, I will say it again, that we want to make it > >very clear that Ada Core Technologies makes no kinds of > >guarantees, nor takes any legal responsibilities, for the > >public versions of GNAT. We do not want to take any other > >steps that could be misinterpreted by others as indications > >that this is not the case. > > You do guarantee that the source you distribute matches the binaries > you distribute, no? Somehow, I'm guessing the answer to this question (with respect to the public version) is "no".