From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb896440a3af23cf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s02.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Steve" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: large arrays X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.21.42.251 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s02 1100063008 24.21.42.251 (Wed, 10 Nov 2004 05:03:28 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 05:03:28 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 05:03:28 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6102 Date: 2004-11-10T05:03:28+00:00 List-Id: I always try to read a post twice before I reply. It helps to avoid some of my silly responses. Steve (The Duck) "Jeff C r e e.m" wrote in message news:kNckd.488755$mD.84928@attbi_s02... > [snip] > > > > If I increase the first upper bound (1_132_000) I get a warning from gnat <-- > > (3.15p) comfirmed at runtime: STORAGE_ERROR: object too large ^ > > ^ > > This means that "My_Array" is too large but of course I can declare a ^ > > second array of same dimensions and so one, i.e. it is not a problem of ^ > > total space (2Go available) neither of bound out of range, etc. ^ > > ^ > > I would be glad to understand the origin of this limit and it would be ^ > > great if somebody could tell me how to extend it. ^ > > Thanks in advance ^ > > Joel ^ > > ^ > > ^ > ^ > You dont say but I assume you are using NAT? ----------------------------^ > > From the GNAT RM (6.2) [snip]