From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.68.197.73 with SMTP id is9mr14212015pbc.0.1397935369000;
        Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!l13no8674300iga.0!news-out.google.com!du2ni12713qab.0!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:22:48 -0500
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:22:45 -0400
From: Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OpenSSL development (Heartbleed)
References: <-OGdnezdYpRWFc_OnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <op.xekl59j2ule2fv@cardamome> <rtqdnZQwg_gRP8_OnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <5352a864$0$6720$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
In-Reply-To: <5352a864$0$6720$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Message-ID: <AZedncaBya-VUM_OnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: 
 sv3-Uzk9MEWVU9QgzKY+q63HqvDOKZR4UC8FSImBGVsAZsQxYHIoC+3CICPnM2WavJ5k4X9jPAzCkM7pDiS!kxe+A5VFMIbqXIZ5cAolaZeZ9v8C9kyOrDkV5jzlQUZEPvsdoFB4Va7JyvRnSsqSne/AvtsbqF4=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2939
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:19447
Date: 2014-04-19T15:22:45-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2014.04.19, 12:46 , Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> On 19/04/14 18:21, Alan Browne wrote:
>> Linux is a pretty reliable and solid OS.  Having "one Master"
>> (Torvalds seems to still be the kernel merge master) and funding
>> obviously helps.
>
> What is the evidence of "obvious" here? I'm not denying
> that something may be the case. However, using "obvious" is either
> political rhetoric, or else one of the lesser habits of mathematical
> style:
>
> Some masters drive things against walls. Costly. Others succeed in
> getting really good things done. Why is that? What is "obvious" here?
>
>
> (You may have heard of the continuing failures to build BER airport.
> In spite of good ideas, good engineers, etc., something is wrong
> somewhere. Obvious?)

I'm sorry if I'm not up to your strict standard of language use - what I =

wanted to point out is that Linux (kernel) has many maintainers but a=20
narrow choke point to release in the form of Mr. Torvalds (and/or his=20
team).

That - for the time being - helps drive reliability.  It does not imply=20
that that model will work for all endeavours, or that it can be copied=20
as is.  What it does imply is that a single-point-of-care-and-release=20
would make for the possibility of stricter control over what can be=20
released - following appropriate change control, requirements=20
definition, testing and so on.

--=20
"Big data can reduce anything to a single number,
  but you shouldn=E2=80=99t be fooled by the appearance of exactitude."
      -Gary Marcus and Ernest Davis, NYT, 2014.04.07