From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aec2c5631508f2aa
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ariel@kazbek.ccs.neu.edu (Ariel Lieberman)
Subject: Re: Ada Windows compilers
Date: 1995/04/05
Message-ID: <ARIEL.95Apr5212403@kazbek.ccs.neu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100939378
references: <3lrvub$np7@booz.bah.com>
organization: College of CS, Northeastern University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-04-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3lrvub$np7@booz.bah.com> casioa@bah.com writes:

> I used Aetech's Integrada for windows last year and was not impressed; it was
> buggy and just didn't work very well. I have long used Alsys' PC Ada compilers 
> and am wondering if their ActivAda is just a re-packaged Integrada, or is it
> indeed as robust as their PC compilers? 
>
> Also, I would welcome any critical feedback on other Ada windows compilers.
> I've tried Meridian's and didn't like it either.


Alsys ActivAda is the same (32bit) PC Ada compiler made to generate Windows
(WIN32s) programs.

There is also the MS-NT (i386) Ada compiler which is better.

-Ariel