From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c4452e384319b30,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Alexander E. Kopilovitch" <aek@pcaek.spb.su>
Subject: Re: The revolution will not be standartized
Date: 1999/12/21
Message-ID: <AAqdyNuOU3@pcaek.spb.su>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 563496413
Distribution: world
Organization: LKVC, St.Petersburg, Russia
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Return-Path: aek@pcaek.spb.su
Date: 1999-12-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In <83od9d$1i8$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:

>In article <385F6039.65A1B1B4@acenet.com.au>,
>  Geoff Bull <gbull@acenet.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ted Dennison wrote:
>> >
>> > Anyway, *given* that Java is doomed,
>>
>> Did you mean to post this to alt.what.have.you.been.smoking ?
>
>
>Well the statement in this generality is of course bogus, but
>it is generally agreed that client java usage is decreasing
>rapidly, and that this technology will not survive. Java will
>likely find its place pretty much exclusively in server apps
>and telephones :-)

Where (i.e., around telephones) Lucent's Inferno waits for it. If I understand
English enough, the words "doom" and "Inferno" are somehow associated with
each other, so original author is generally right, athough inexact.


Alexander Kopilovitch                      aek@vib.usr.pu.ru
Saint-Petersburg
Russia