From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,57d25404e12d2837 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-01 08:12:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!chnws02.mediaone.net!chnws06.ne.mediaone.net!24.128.8.70!typhoon.ne.mediaone.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey Creem" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: How to catch NaNs with gnat3.14p X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:10:08 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.5.146 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net X-Trace: typhoon.ne.mediaone.net 1012579808 66.31.5.146 (Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:10:08 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:10:08 EST Organization: ATT Broadband Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19488 Date: 2002-02-01T16:10:08+00:00 List-Id: Umm..Read manual againto be sure..I think you are still missing stack checks without -fstack-check "Alexander Boucke" wrote in message news:a3eelm$9sq$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE... > yes, -gnato says it's only for integers. But using -gnato is my default, > since this enables all runtime checks unsing gnat (as intended by the RM). > And since I did not exclude any checks using a pragma, all possible checks > should now be enabled. > > Alexander > >