201. Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why?
- by Luke A. Guest @ 2004-01-03 12:20 UTC [4%]
202. Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why?
- by Simon Wright @ 2004-01-03 11:53 UTC [5%]
203. Re: Question about OO programming in Ada
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2003-12-03 14:45 UTC [0%]
204. Re: Question about OO programming in Ada
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2003-12-03 14:11 UTC [0%]
205. Re: Question about OO programming in Ada
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2003-12-03 13:41 UTC [4%]
206. Re: Importing ld memory defintions into ada code
- by @ 2003-08-08 14:17 UTC [4%]
207. Re: Limited_Controlled types as 'out' arguments
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2003-07-31 11:50 UTC [0%]
208. Re: Limited_Controlled types as 'out' arguments
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2003-07-31 10:54 UTC [4%]
209. Re: Limited_Controlled types as 'out' arguments
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2003-07-30 15:52 UTC [4%]
210. Re: Limited_Controlled types as 'out' arguments
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2003-07-30 12:57 UTC [5%]
211. Re: Q: Endless loop by dispatching
- by Robert I. Eachus @ 2003-07-19 0:25 UTC [3%]
212. Re: Gnat Bug detected?
- by Robert I. Eachus @ 2003-07-16 17:23 UTC [0%]
213. Gnat Bug detected?
- by Timo Warns @ 2003-07-16 12:57 UTC [5%]
214. Re: The old "Object.Method" syntax debate
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2003-05-28 12:36 UTC [3%]
215. Re: Allocating Memory with "new"
- by Peter Richtmyer @ 2003-04-25 22:19 UTC [5%]
216. Re: Allocating Memory with "new"
- by Stephen Leake @ 2003-04-25 15:09 UTC [4%]
217. Re: Fussy Standard: what is modulo Address?
- by Simon Wright @ 2003-01-22 23:06 UTC [5%]
218. Re: Unchecked_Conversion and alignment
- by Victor Porton @ 2003-01-21 21:15 UTC [0%]
219. Re: Unchecked_Conversion and alignment
- by Jeffrey Carter @ 2003-01-21 19:41 UTC [0%]
220. Re: Unchecked_Conversion and alignment
- by Robert A Duff @ 2003-01-21 19:39 UTC [0%]
221. Re: Unchecked_Conversion and alignment
- by Victor Porton @ 2003-01-21 18:50 UTC [0%]
222. Re: Unchecked_Conversion and alignment
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2003-01-21 15:59 UTC [0%]
223. Re: Unchecked_Conversion and alignment
- by Stephen Leake @ 2003-01-21 15:18 UTC [0%]
224. Re: Q: Creating my own storage pools
- by Stephen Leake @ 2003-01-21 15:10 UTC [5%]
225. Unchecked_Conversion and alignment
- by Victor Porton @ 2003-01-21 7:01 UTC [4%]
226. Re: Porting from Modula-2 to Ada
- by Jeffrey Carter @ 2002-10-18 21:29 UTC [4%]
227. Re: Porting from Modula-2 to Ada
- by Jeffrey Creem @ 2002-10-18 10:55 UTC [0%]
228. Re: Porting from Modula-2 to Ada
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2002-10-18 10:33 UTC [4%]
229. Re: Simple Question - Direct Access to memory with ADA
- by Robert A Duff @ 2002-07-02 20:23 UTC [3%]
230. Re: Simple Question - Direct Access to memory with ADA
- by Pat Rogers @ 2002-07-02 19:46 UTC [3%]
231. Re: Interfaces.C.Strings
- by Jeffrey Carter @ 2002-06-03 19:09 UTC [5%]
232. Help with Copying Shared Memory to Local
- by John Cupak @ 2002-05-23 13:50 UTC [4%]
233. Re: Bytes per character (was Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?)
- by sk @ 2002-04-29 22:51 UTC [0%]
234. Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?
- by sk @ 2002-04-29 2:29 UTC [0%]
235. Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?
- by Nick Roberts @ 2002-04-28 23:12 UTC [0%]
236. Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?
- by James Ross @ 2002-04-28 21:48 UTC [4%]
237. Re: 64bit access to an array of 8bit values
- by Pat Rogers @ 2002-03-04 3:15 UTC [3%]
238. Re: Device driver in Ada95
- by Dave Poirier @ 2002-02-26 0:02 UTC [4%]
239. Re: List Container Strawman 1.4
- by Hyman Rosen @ 2001-12-30 6:31 UTC [0%]
240. Re: List Container Strawman 1.4
- by Matthew Heaney @ 2001-12-29 23:23 UTC [4%]
241. Re: Ada 200X Assertions
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2001-12-04 8:54 UTC [3%]
242. Re: Error with: for EntryName use at 16#address#;
- by Jerry van Dijk @ 2001-11-27 20:41 UTC [0%]
243. Re: Error with: for EntryName use at 16#address#;
- by Louis Granger @ 2001-11-27 19:26 UTC [5%]
244. Re: pointer movement?
- by Robert Dewar @ 2001-11-18 2:19 UTC [0%]
245. Re: pointer movement?
- by Nick Roberts @ 2001-11-17 17:54 UTC [0%]
246. Re: pointer movement?
- by Gautier Write-only-address @ 2001-11-17 14:18 UTC [0%]
247. pointer movement?
- by Andrzej Rybczynski @ 2001-11-17 11:39 UTC [4%]
248. Re: A copy question....
- by Mark Doherty @ 2001-10-16 10:09 UTC [0%]
249. Re: A copy question....
- by tmoran @ 2001-10-15 17:00 UTC [5%]
250. Re: A copy question....
- by Dale Stanbrough @ 2001-10-15 11:21 UTC [4%]
251. Re: How can you convert.....
- by tmoran @ 2001-10-04 19:44 UTC [0%]
252. Re: How can you convert.....
- by Stephen Leake @ 2001-10-03 17:38 UTC [4%]
253. Re: How can you convert.....
- by James Rogers @ 2001-10-03 12:14 UTC [4%]
254. Re: Convert Integer_Address and Address?
- by Stephen Leake @ 2001-10-01 21:49 UTC [4%]
255. Re: Ada And Alternate System Architectures
- by Claude SIMON @ 2001-08-23 17:10 UTC [4%]
256. Re: Ada and pointers
- by Marin David Condic @ 2001-08-15 21:00 UTC [0%]
257. Re: Ada and pointers
- by James Rogers @ 2001-08-15 19:52 UTC [5%]
258. Re[2]: Re[2]: Storage Pool
- by ANH_VO @ 2001-06-14 13:21 UTC [5%]
259. Storage Pool
- by ANH_VO @ 2001-06-13 19:25 UTC [6%]
260. AdaYY wish list from current projects
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2001-02-20 20:50 UTC [3%]
261. Re: Green Hiils AdaMULTI 2000 -> Motorola Coldfire
- by Martin Dowie @ 2001-01-11 14:22 UTC [4%]
262. Re: Interrupts service
- by Marc A. Criley @ 2001-01-05 13:20 UTC [0%]
263. Interrupts service
- by Szygula @ 2001-01-05 12:28 UTC [5%]
264. Re: gnat/ppc and a32 blt transfers
- by DuckE @ 2000-11-02 4:55 UTC [4%]
265. Re: S'Write and How To Count Bytes
- by Marin David Condic @ 2000-10-03 5:21 UTC [0%]
266. Re: S'Write and How To Count Bytes
- by Mario Amado Alves @ 2000-10-03 0:00 UTC [0%]
267. Re: S'Write and How To Count Bytes
- by tmoran @ 2000-10-02 0:00 UTC [3%]
268. Re: ada to c interfaces and CHARS_PTR
- by Simon Wright @ 2000-03-11 0:00 UTC [3%]
269. Re: New to ada95: porting
- by tmoran @ 2000-03-01 0:00 UTC [5%]
270. Re: More C
- by tmoran @ 2000-01-28 0:00 UTC [2%]
271. more information on OS and compiler
- by Alexander Van Hecke @ 2000-01-07 0:00 UTC [0%]
272. question about COM2
- by Alexander Van Hecke @ 2000-01-06 0:00 UTC [3%]
273. Re: Apex vs GNAT on solaris
- by reason67 @ 1999-12-07 0:00 UTC [7%]
274. Re: Apex vs GNAT on solaris
- by reason67 @ 1999-12-07 0:00 UTC [3%]
275. Re: VIDEO MEMORY ACCESS WITH POINTERS
- by Nick Roberts @ 1999-11-29 0:00 UTC [0%]
276. Re: VIDEO MEMORY ACCESS WITH POINTERS
- by DuckE @ 1999-11-27 0:00 UTC [5%]
277. Announcing GNAT version 3.12p for Linux and Sparc Solaris
- by Robert Dewar @ 1999-10-19 0:00 UTC [1%]
278. Re: [A bit OT] Problems with GNAT 3.11p
- by Robert Dewar @ 1999-09-26 0:00 UTC [1%]
279. Re: Elimination of "use" clauses
- by Robert Dewar @ 1999-07-12 0:00 UTC [0%]
280. Re: Elimination of "use" clauses
- by Simon Wright @ 1999-07-10 0:00 UTC [4%]
281. Re: Convert an address range into an array
- by David C. Hoos, Sr. @ 1999-06-06 0:00 UTC [5%]
282. Re: Convert an address range into an array
- by Robert Dewar @ 1999-06-06 0:00 UTC [2%]
283. Creation of storage pools
- by Graeme Perkes @ 1999-05-26 0:00 UTC [6%]
284. Re: Is an RTOS Required for Ada?
- by George Romanski @ 1999-05-26 0:00 UTC [0%]
285. Re: Is an RTOS Required for Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1999-05-25 0:00 UTC [3%]
286. Re: Direct memory access
- by robert_dewar @ 1999-03-26 0:00 UTC [4%]
287. Re: Direct memory access
- by Tom Moran @ 1999-03-25 0:00 UTC [5%]
288. Re: Direct memory access
- by Markus Kuhn @ 1999-03-25 0:00 UTC [3%]
289. Re: Handling Addressing Errors
- by Nick Roberts @ 1999-03-04 0:00 UTC [4%]
290. Re: Imported deferred constant with an address clause legal?
- by Robert A Duff @ 1999-03-01 0:00 UTC [0%]
291. Garbage Collection for Ada
- by Nick Roberts @ 1999-02-19 0:00 UTC [3%]
292. Imported deferred constant with an address clause legal?
- by Rod Chapman @ 1999-02-18 0:00 UTC [6%]
293. Adding Things to Package System
- by Charles H. Sampson @ 1999-02-18 0:00 UTC [5%]
294. Re: Preelaborable address clause?
- by Nick Roberts @ 1999-02-12 0:00 UTC [5%]
295. Preelaborable address clause?
- by Rod Chapman @ 1999-02-10 0:00 UTC [4%]
296. Re: Preelaborable address clause?
- by Niklas Holsti @ 1999-02-10 0:00 UTC [0%]
297. Re: Wanted: Ada STL. Reward: Ada's Future
- by Ehud Lamm @ 1999-02-04 0:00 UTC [0%]
298. Re: Wanted: Ada STL. Reward: Ada's Future
- by Richard D Riehle @ 1999-02-02 0:00 UTC [4%]
299. Re: Wanted: Ada STL. Reward: Ada's Future
- by robert_dewar @ 1999-02-02 0:00 UTC [4%]
300. Re: system."+" renaming using GNAT
- by Tucker Taft @ 1999-01-13 0:00 UTC [6%]
301. Re: Unrecognized attribute 'ref in GNAT
- by Tucker Taft @ 1999-01-13 0:00 UTC [5%]
302. Re: system."+" renaming using GNAT
- by David C. Hoos, Sr. @ 1999-01-12 0:00 UTC [5%]
303. Re: How do I get this to work??
- by Tom Moran @ 1999-01-10 0:00 UTC [4%]
304. Re: How do I get this to work??
- by robert_dewar @ 1999-01-10 0:00 UTC [3%]
305. Re: System Calls
- by dewar @ 1998-12-25 0:00 UTC [4%]
306. Re: Ada95 Streams
- by david.c.hoos.sr @ 1998-12-05 0:00 UTC [3%]
307. Re: simple question - how to emulate void * ?
- by Tucker Taft @ 1998-10-24 0:00 UTC [5%]
308. Re: simple question - how to emulate void * ?
- by Dale Stanbrough @ 1998-10-24 0:00 UTC [5%]
309. Re: simple question - how to emulate void * ?
- by Robert A Duff @ 1998-10-24 0:00 UTC [4%]
310. Re: simple question - how to emulate void * ?
- by David C. Hoos, Sr. @ 1998-10-23 0:00 UTC [6%]
311. Re: simple question - how to emulate void * ?
- by David C. Hoos, Sr. @ 1998-10-23 0:00 UTC [6%]
312. Re: simple question - how to emulate void * ?
- by Dale Stanbrough @ 1998-10-23 0:00 UTC [4%]
313. Re: PLEASE HELP ME
- by Tucker Taft @ 1998-10-22 0:00 UTC [5%]
314. Re: simple question - how to emulate void * ?
- by Hans Marqvardsen @ 1998-10-22 0:00 UTC [0%]
315. Re: Classwide-type assignments [longish]
- by Niklas Holsti @ 1998-10-15 0:00 UTC [3%]
316. Re: Classwide-type assignments
- by Niklas Holsti @ 1998-10-13 0:00 UTC [0%]
317. Classwide-type assignments
- by jsanchor @ 1998-10-12 0:00 UTC [4%]
318. Re: Freeing Pointers to classwide types
- by dewarr @ 1998-10-01 0:00 UTC [4%]
319. Re: Low Level IO
- by Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen @ 1998-08-07 0:00 UTC [0%]
320. Low Level IO
- by JOSE VICENTE @ 1998-08-06 0:00 UTC [4%]
321. Re: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages
- by Matthew Heaney @ 1998-07-28 0:00 UTC [3%]
322. Re: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages
- by Jean-Pierre Rosen @ 1998-07-28 0:00 UTC [0%]
323. Re: What is the Ada Run Time System ?
- by Tucker Taft @ 1998-07-23 0:00 UTC [4%]
324. deallocating class-wide objects
- by Stephen Leake @ 1998-07-06 0:00 UTC [6%]
325. Re: need code improvment
- by Matthew Heaney @ 1998-05-19 0:00 UTC [4%]
326. Re: need code improvment
- by Steve Doiel @ 1998-05-18 0:00 UTC [4%]
327. Re: Initialized global data
- by Simon Wright @ 1998-05-09 0:00 UTC [5%]
328. Re: Disk Tracer - help
- by Michael F Brenner @ 1998-05-07 0:00 UTC [3%]
329. Re: Dynamic Instantiation in Ada95 ?
- by Stephen Leake @ 1998-04-16 0:00 UTC [4%]
330. Re: type names (was Re: Child package: private type and IO)
- by Fergus Henderson @ 1998-03-04 0:00 UTC [2%]
331. Re: type names (was Re: Child package: private type and IO)
- by Matthew Heaney @ 1998-03-01 0:00 UTC [1%]
332. Re: question re Ada equivalent of C function
- by Nick Roberts @ 1998-02-22 0:00 UTC [4%]
333. Re: question re Ada equivalent of C function
- by Nick Roberts @ 1998-02-22 0:00 UTC [0%]
334. Re: question re Ada equivalent of C function
- by Brian Rogoff @ 1998-02-21 0:00 UTC [4%]
335. Re: question re Ada equivalent of C function
- by Robert Dewar @ 1998-02-21 0:00 UTC [4%]
336. Re: pointers to unconstrained arrays
- by Keith Thompson @ 1997-11-17 0:00 UTC [4%]
337. Re: Q: How to do memory access with gnat
- by Michael Erdmann @ 1997-07-22 0:00 UTC [5%]
338. Re: Q: How to do memory access with gnat - os.ADB (0/1)
- by Michael Erdmann @ 1997-07-20 0:00 UTC [3%]
339. Re: Q: How to do memory access with gnat - OS.ADS (0/1)
- by Michael Erdmann @ 1997-07-20 0:00 UTC [3%]
340. Re: Why Ada is not the Commercial Lang of Choice
- by Robert I. Eachus @ 1997-06-28 0:00 UTC [4%]
341. Re: Why Ada is not the Commercial Lang of Choice
- by Keith Thompson @ 1997-06-21 0:00 UTC [0%]
342. Re: Why Ada is not the Commercial Lang of Choice
- by Robert Dewar @ 1997-06-20 0:00 UTC [3%]
343. Re: Why Ada is not the Commercial Lang of Choice
- by Robert I. Eachus @ 1997-06-18 0:00 UTC [4%]
344. Re: STL in Ada95 [was: Any research putting c above ada?]
- by Brian Rogoff @ 1997-05-24 0:00 UTC [0%]
345. Re: STL in Ada95 [was: Any research putting c above ada?]
- by Jon S Anthony @ 1997-05-23 0:00 UTC [4%]
346. Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
- by Keith Thompson @ 1997-01-19 0:00 UTC [0%]
347. Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
- by Keith Thompson @ 1997-01-10 0:00 UTC [3%]
348. Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1997-01-10 0:00 UTC [2%]
349. Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
- by Matt Austern @ 1997-01-10 0:00 UTC [0%]
350. Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1997-01-07 0:00 UTC [3%]
351. Re: DOS interrupts with GNAT 3.04
- by Michael F Brenner @ 1996-12-24 0:00 UTC [2%]
352. Re: Modest proposal, 3 of 3
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-11-26 0:00 UTC [3%]
353. Re: Looking for generic hash function
- by Robert I. Eachus @ 1996-08-19 0:00 UTC [6%]
354. Re: GNAT and interrupts with DJGPP and CWSPR0
- by Jerry van Dijk @ 1996-08-16 0:00 UTC [3%]
355. Re: C++'s pointer vs Ada's Access type
- by David Weller @ 1996-08-01 0:00 UTC [4%]
356. Re: Gnat For use at Question
- by Spasmo @ 1996-07-19 0:00 UTC [3%]
357. Re: Why couldn't an operating system be written in ada
- by Jon S Anthony @ 1996-07-16 0:00 UTC [3%]
358. Re: Gnat For use at Question
- by Spasmo @ 1996-07-12 0:00 UTC [5%]
359. Re: Gnat For use at Question
- by Jon S Anthony @ 1996-07-11 0:00 UTC [5%]
360. Re: Gnat For use at Question
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-11 0:00 UTC [3%]
361. Re: Q: unboxed values and polymorphism
- by Hannes Haug @ 1996-06-19 0:00 UTC [2%]
362. Re: Q: memory management
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-16 0:00 UTC [5%]
363. Re: GNAT 3.03 and Address Clauses
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-06 0:00 UTC [4%]
364. Re: GNAT 3.03 and Address Clauses
- by David Weller @ 1996-05-04 0:00 UTC [4%]
365. GNAT 3.03 and Address Clauses
- by Rob Pettit @ 1996-04-29 0:00 UTC [5%]
366. Re: GNAT 3.03 and Address Clauses
- by Robert A Duff @ 1996-04-29 0:00 UTC [0%]
367. Re: How to print Task_ID type? (GNAT SunOS)
- by Keith Thompson @ 1996-04-07 0:00 UTC [4%]
368. Re: How to print Task_ID type? (GNAT SunOS)
- by Keith Thompson @ 1996-04-05 0:00 UTC [4%]
369. Re: How to print Task_ID type? (GNAT SunOS)
- by Laurent Guerby @ 1996-04-05 0:00 UTC [4%]
370. Re: How to print Task_ID type? (GNAT SunOS)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-05 0:00 UTC [4%]
371. Re: How to print Task_ID type? (GNAT SunOS)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-05 0:00 UTC [3%]
372. Re: Access to Address conversion question
- by Norman H. Cohen @ 1996-03-22 0:00 UTC [5%]
373. Access to Address conversion question
- by Jerry van Dijk @ 1996-03-21 0:00 UTC [5%]
374. Re: Which "/" is referenced in a numeric literal expression?
- by Gene Ouye @ 1996-02-26 0:00 UTC [4%]
375. Re: Importing C Structures
- by Norman H. Cohen @ 1995-03-27 16:00 UTC [4%]
376. GNAT 2.00 - What "ambiguous expression"
- by Paul H. Whittington @ 1995-03-26 8:15 UTC [3%]
377. Re: Importing C Structures
- by Bob Gilbert @ 1995-03-24 20:20 UTC [2%]
378. Re: Importing C Structures
- by Vladimir Vukicevic @ 1995-03-24 8:51 UTC [5%]
379. Re: Pointers
- by Tucker Taft @ 1995-03-13 15:54 UTC [3%]
380. Re: Type t is MOD c???
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-07 11:56 UTC [4%]
381. Re: Type t is MOD c???
- by Vladimir Vukicevic @ 1995-02-07 7:16 UTC [6%]
382. Re: Type System.ADDRESS
- by Bob Gilbert @ 1994-11-02 15:45 UTC [3%]
383. Re: Type System.ADDRESS
- by Tucker Taft @ 1994-11-02 5:51 UTC [4%]
384. SOLVED! Decoupled Mutual Recursion Challenger
- by John Volan @ 1994-10-12 22:49 UTC [1%]
Results 201-384 of 384 prev (newer) | reverse | options above
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox