From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3446063322b22cb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s52.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Thick vs. Thin bindings
References: <41a746a0@x-privat.org>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <9xAqd.106968$V41.55610@attbi_s52>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.161.24.234
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s52 1101714629 67.161.24.234 (Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:50:29 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:50:29 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:50:29 GMT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6616
Date: 2004-11-29T07:50:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Would anyone like to elaborate on the pros and cons of these
> two binding methodologies? Further reading material? Tutorials? Thx!
  Section 2.1 of our TriAda paper "CLAW, a High Level, Portable, Ada 95
Binding for Microsoft Windows" at www.rrsoftware.com has some discussion
of Thin vs Thick.  I think of Thickness as like insulation or padding,
where more Thickness protects you from the sharp edges and holes, but
has different costs.