From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,beb6b378a857b7ea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-20 12:43:39 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!newsfeed1.telenordia.se!algonet!uab.ericsson.se!news.sics.se!not-for-mail
From: "Jimmy Dub�n" <duben@fatburen.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Use of entries using Ravenscar
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 21:34:44 +0100
Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science
Message-ID: <9vti1h$183d$1@not.sics.se>
References: <4948089f.0112180828.2ea4c80@posting.google.com>
 <4948089f.0112192354.5411f0ed@posting.google.com>
 <usna67xaf.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <rhnU7.2806$US4.371003@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fatburen176.fatburen.org
X-Trace: not.sics.se 1008880497 41069 194.236.216.176 (20 Dec 2001 20:34:57
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@not.sics.se
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Dec 2001 20:34:57 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18171
Date: 2001-12-20T20:34:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> > If I recall correctly, the Ravenscar profile forbids entries. Or maybe
> > that was only on tasks?
>
> Task entries are forbidden but not PO entries but you're only allowed
> one queued entry at a time...

But this surely does only have one queued entry, right?

>
> > In any case, this is complaining about the internals of the GNAT
> > runtime system; note the package name "System.Tasking". It could be
> > you have some object and/or .ali files hanging around from either "the
> > old compiler" or "compiling without Pragma (Ravenscar)". Try deleting
> > _everything_, and recompiling from scratch.
>
> The other thing I noticed was that nothing in the code actually
> required this unit to be withed in at all. (true of a couple of other
> with's and they certainly don't need to be withed in at the spec
> level - with things at as low a level as possible).

How can that affect the compiler errors?