From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9ae83f38fb0c89d8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ae83f38fb0c89d8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-19 14:12:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer.radix.net!news1.radix.net!not-for-mail From: Universe Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.object Subject: Re: TEST MESSAGE--PLEASE REPLY Date: 19 Dec 2001 22:12:01 GMT Organization: RadixNet Internet Services Message-ID: <9vr3bh$8eo$3@news1.Radix.Net> References: <3C1FA07C.3A84C2BC@mitre.org> <3c1fa209.637631078@nntp.interaccess.com> <3C209523.22534BA2@gperkins.co.uk> <3C20FDCE.C1BCFB20@spamcop.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: saltmine.radix.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18126 comp.object:28683 Date: 2001-12-19T22:12:01+00:00 List-Id: In comp.object Wes Groleau wrote: > > >> Oh come on, Thaddeus! You can do better than that! >> A blistering response on his stupidity at not using >> alt.test would be entirely justified. > > How would he get any replies from alt.test? People look for their successful posting and would see: *** PLEASE RESPOND! **** or similar