"Thierry Lelegard" <thierry.lelegard@canal-plus.fr> a �crit dans le message news: 3C1DB7B7.DF767F9@canal-plus.fr...
> I think that the trap in this kind of applications (servers with one
> or more tasks per client connection) is the fate of the tasks when
> the client disconnects. If you let the tasks die and recreate new
> tasks for new client connections, you will most certainly face some
> slow memory leak. We have seen that, although the stack itself is
> deallocated when a task dies, there aer a few bytes which remain
> allocated (some kind of TCB I suppose).
>
This was due to the (in)famous Rosen's pathology ;-)
It has been (fortunately) exterminated in in Ada 95, so the problem should not appear any more.

--
---------------------------------------------------------
           J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr