From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,92c39a3be0a7f17d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-12 01:05:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn From: rob@z Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Future with Ada Date: 12 Dec 2001 00:33:35 -0800 Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com] Message-ID: <9v74ov014bc@drn.newsguy.com> References: <9v57u1$mfb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-087.newsdawg.com X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 2.91 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17821 Date: 2001-12-12T00:33:35-08:00 List-Id: In article <9v57u1$mfb$1@nh.pace.co.uk>, "Marin says... > >Certainly, XML would be a good basis for reasons of portability. Not only >for GUI building but any sort of document formatting. So hypothetically, a >good start would be to build a word processor in Ada that stored its >documents in XML and, if possible, had its GUI built from XML. you guys are going about it all the wrong way. to make Ada more popular, you do not need to write yet another word processor in it (star office is doing pretty well anyway). Put the effort into reusable standard packages. there are so many areas where Ada has no standard packages to do things. Take Java libraries as an example.