From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fdc75443ea18fb32 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-29 11:10:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!psinet-eu-nl!psiuk-p4!psiuk-p3!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "Marin David Condic" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Standard Queue status Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:58:55 -0500 Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc Message-ID: <9u60hh$3dt$1@nh.pace.co.uk> References: <%QRM7.39743$xS6.65958@www.newsranger.com> <9u0qhb$pq5$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9u0ujd$rhg$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9u5ll7$ron$1@nh.pace.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-200-133.miami.pace.co.uk X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 1007060337 3517 136.170.200.133 (29 Nov 2001 18:58:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@news.cam.pace.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Nov 2001 18:58:57 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17182 Date: 2001-11-29T18:58:57+00:00 List-Id: Sorry. I didn't mean to sound critical. More a case of my not understanding why list elements shouldn't be private - I don't get the requirement. Is the idea that they should be limited private rather than private? ("Limited" is still "private"). I'd restate the requirement as "list elements should be limited" if that is the case. MDC -- Marin David Condic Senior Software Engineer Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com Enabling the digital revolution e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com Web: http://www.mcondic.com/ "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:uy9kpfnxl.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov... > "Marin David Condic" writes: > > > "Stephen Leake" wrote in message > > news:ubshlheoj.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov... > > > > > > > > list elements must not be private > > > > > Why not? Are you saying they need to be limited private? What would you > > expect them to be if they were not private? > > I was not actually stating an opinion on any of these criteria; I was > simply listing them, so others could state their opinions on each one. > > I guess I should reply to my message, and state my opinions on each. >