Re: Standard Queue status

["Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org>]

Sorry. I didn't mean to sound critical. More a case of my not understanding
why list elements shouldn't be private - I don't get the requirement. Is the
idea that they should be limited private rather than private? ("Limited" is
still "private"). I'd restate the requirement as "list elements should be
limited" if that is the case.

MDC
--
Marin David Condic
Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology Americas    www.pacemicro.com
Enabling the digital revolution
e-Mail:    marin.condic@pacemicro.com
Web:      http://www.mcondic.com/


"Stephen Leake" <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:uy9kpfnxl.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov...
> "Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org> writes:
>
> > "Stephen Leake" <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote in message
> > news:ubshlheoj.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov...
> > <snip>
> > >
> > > list elements must not be private
> > >
> > Why not? Are you saying they need to be limited private? What would you
> > expect them to be if they were not private?
>
> I was not actually stating an opinion on any of these criteria; I was
> simply listing them, so others could state their opinions on each one.
>
> I guess I should reply to my message, and state my opinions on each.
>