From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00, LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fdc75443ea18fb32 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-27 12:03:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!psinet-eu-nl!psiuk-p4!psiuk-p3!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "Marin David Condic" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Queue Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:45:46 -0500 Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc Message-ID: <9u0qhb$pq5$1@nh.pace.co.uk> References: <%QRM7.39743$xS6.65958@www.newsranger.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-200-133.miami.pace.co.uk X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 1006890347 26437 136.170.200.133 (27 Nov 2001 19:45:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@news.cam.pace.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Nov 2001 19:45:47 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17059 Date: 2001-11-27T19:45:47+00:00 List-Id: Or, if we had been able to settle on something and agree that it was going to be The One, we could have said "Here's a link to the standard Ada data structure library..." and forced professors everywhere to ban its use in Data Structures courses. :-) I'd still be willing to settle on the BC's with some enhancements and extensions. Anybody else willing to go that route? MDC -- Marin David Condic Senior Software Engineer Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com Enabling the digital revolution e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com Web: http://www.mcondic.com/ "Ted Dennison" wrote in message news:%QRM7.39743$xS6.65958@www.newsranger.com... > > Yeah. If we knew the answer to that question unanamously, there would have been > about 150 less posts here in the last two weeks. :-) >