From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5385624f72218ba7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-19 11:51:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!194.213.69.151!news.algonet.se!algonet!news2.tninet.se!not-for-mail From: "Peter Hend�n" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaOS Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:51:37 +0100 Organization: Teknisk Dokumentation AB Sender: root@algonet.invalid Message-ID: <9tbnrp$mok$1@green.tninet.se> References: <9r8pvf$vms$1@papyrus.erlm.siemens.de> <9rk11n$e4n$1@plutonium.btinternet.com> <9rk749$ndt$1@papyrus.erlm.siemens.de> <9rnid9$541$1@neptunium.btinternet.com> <9s3u20$10s0sv$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <9s670f$u2e$1@papyrus.erlm.siemens.de> <9s74eb$12b2bq$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <9s76dh$ls0$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9s9413$11mrei$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <071120011028298704%philip@no-spam.cs.uwa.edu.au> <9scke6$12jb14$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <3BF019F4.C9C460E5@mida.se> <9t6av9$601$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <9t6srn$nbro$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> Reply-To: "Peter Hend�n" NNTP-Posting-Host: wilhelmina.algonet.se X-Trace: green.tninet.se 1006199482 23316 194.213.75.170 (19 Nov 2001 19:51:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@algonet.se NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 19:51:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16698 Date: 2001-11-19T20:51:37+01:00 List-Id: "Ted Dennison" wrote in message news:A8bK7.30408$xS6.49183@www.newsranger.com... > In article <9t6srn$nbro$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>, Nick Roberts says... > > > >Does anyone else -- outside the context of Windows -- make earnest use of > >the term HAL? > > Not that I've ever heard. I think most reasonable CS types would prefer to avoid > any assoication with their work and the beserk computer from 2001. :-) http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/docs-1.2.1/ref/ecos-ref/the-ecos-hardware-abs traction-layer-hal.html http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=3576 http://www.aero.polimi.it/projects/rtai/ Personally I heard it some 20 years ago in a definitely non-Microsofty CS environment. The term HAL may have originated at Digital, but thats just a guess based on the fact that most computers in that environment were DEC PDP-11s, 10s and 20s. /Peter H.