From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,XPRIO autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a6dbac911d455814,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-12 07:12:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.238.2.15!skynet.be!skynet.be!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!btnet-peer0!btnet-feed5!btnet!mendelevium.btinternet.com!not-for-mail From: "Tony Gair" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: looking for a fast re-usable non-pointer data structure .... Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:02:52 -0800 Organization: BT Internet Message-ID: <9sookc$d83$1@neptunium.btinternet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-34-85-11.in-addr.btopenworld.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16325 Date: 2001-11-12T15:02:52-08:00 List-Id: Does anyone know of reasonably fast data structure to store a large amount of records. The reason I want this is that I have a protected object which uses an avl tree from the booch components which I want to use with the distributed annex, which currently does not like my avl tree at all. Any ideas, has anyone used an avl tree as a remote protected objected object with the distributed annex, Should I dump the annex...or the avl tree