From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ce0900b60ca3f616 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-08 03:51:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!194.8.194.95!news.netcologne.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Side-Effects in Functions [Rosen Trick] Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: <9sdrki$2j4$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> References: <9rue9f$j4t$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9ruiet$kqg$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3BE3235D.E292B890@boeing.com> <3BE35498.9F6381A2@acm.org> <9s230d$107b5a$2@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <5ee5b646.0111040507.5ca7ea23@posting.google.com> <9s3tl3$111hco$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <5ee5b646.0111041846.93f3e07@posting.google.com> <9s74ee$12b2bq$3@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1005220306 2660 134.91.4.34 (8 Nov 2001 11:51:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:51:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16055 Date: 2001-11-08T11:51:46+00:00 List-Id: Nick Roberts wrote: : On whether it is good practice to program functions with side-effects, Well, that's it, then? If your opinion is that strong, maybe you should really give Haskell a chance. Also, I've found Paulson's remarks on the issue (in an early chapter of his ML book) instructive. (But then I am not someone with an abundance of languages and their compilation techniques in his head, like others here, but I seem to recall that this subject has been debated for decades?) Georg