From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,88093378be1184d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-06 10:56:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!212.43.194.69!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!157.161.139.35.MISMATCH!106952618!news.imp.ch!psinet-eu-nl!psiuk-p4!psiuk-p3!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "Marin David Condic" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: List Container Straw Man Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:25:01 -0500 Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc Message-ID: <9s99tt$pdb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> References: <9s941p$11mrei$4@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-200-133.miami.pace.co.uk X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 1005071101 26027 136.170.200.133 (6 Nov 2001 18:25:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@news.cam.pace.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Nov 2001 18:25:01 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15941 Date: 2001-11-06T18:25:01+00:00 List-Id: Doing what Ted did and throwing out a package spec (or two or three...) would be a good idea. Its hard to see the merits of something like this without some actual code to criticise. It need not include all details or all possible operations - just enough of the basics to indicate how the idea would be realized. MDC -- Marin David Condic Senior Software Engineer Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com Enabling the digital revolution e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com Web: http://www.mcondic.com/ "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:uwv13dcz0.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov... > > But to give a more detailed response, I need to see an actual > proposal. By which I mean code, including the "general-purpose" part, > and the re-worked list package. >