From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d35129bfe20357c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-29 23:27:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.uncensored-news.com!propagator-la!news-in-la.newsfeeds.com!news-in.superfeed.net!news.cesnet.cz!crax.cesnet.cz!news.felk.cvut.cz!not-for-mail
From: "Sergey Koshcheyev" <serko84@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Limited Type Access - Again
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 08:07:47 +0100
Organization: Czech Technical University
Message-ID: <9rljk7$1a5r$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>
References: <mailman.1004394165.6249.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: n56.dkm.cz
X-Trace: ns.felk.cvut.cz 1004425671 43195 62.24.79.56 (30 Oct 2001 07:07:51
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ns.felk.cvut.cz
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:07:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15395
Date: 2001-10-30T08:07:47+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<ANH_VO@udlp.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.1004394165.6249.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org...
> If equality and assignment are allowed in this case, then it is the back
door
> for comparing and assigning objects of limited type such as task type and
> projected type. I think this door should be locked. In addition, comparing
or
> assignment two objects of a task type does not make sense. In fact, the
language
> prohibits two objects of a limited type from being compared or assigned.
This is
> the reason why equality and assignment of a limited type are prohibited.

But you don't compare and assign *objects* in your example, you compare and
assign *pointers* to those objects. Why should the latter not be allowed?

Sergey Koshcheyev.