From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ebbccbc114d641e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-24 10:25:17 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!h133n2fls20o974.telia.COM!not-for-mail
From: "Bror Johansson" <brjohan@email.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: SV: Remarriages, how common is it? [off-topic]
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:59:57 +0100
Message-ID: <9r6thm$r1qm2$1@ID-59332.news.dfncis.de>
References: <3BD498DF.27E8B66C@otelco.net>
 <i8STsTUTvbho@eisner.encompasserve.org> <9r32tg$kkl$1@newstoo.ericsson.se>
 <3BD590E9.DF0A8D31@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: h133n2fls20o974.telia.com (212.181.170.133)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1003944316 28371650 212.181.170.133 (16 [59332])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15140
Date: 2001-10-24T11:59:57+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Wes Groleau <wwgrol@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> skrev i
diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:3BD590E9.DF0A8D31@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com.
..
>
>
> Petter Fryklund wrote:
> > are already there, but I'm curious since my grandmother and grandfather
on
> > my mothers side where married  twice with several years passing (I don't
> >
> > > For marriages, some people marry each other multiple
>
> In my mind the biggest flaw in GEDCOM is the assumption
> that every person is a child of exactly one family and
> husband or wife of zero to many.
>
> I'd love to see something simlar to GEDCOM except that
> people are related to other people directly instead of
> indirectly by family group.
>
> Family could still be there as one case of a group
> record which has members with roles and time spans.
>

As far as I have been informed about the forthcoming GEDCOM/XML (from The
Family and Church History Department of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints) it will be capable of handling most - if not all -
(well-)known defiencies of present-day GEDCOM.

/BJ