From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-17 23:16:09 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!lnsnews.lns.cornell.edu!paradoxa.ogoense.net!sn-xit-04!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!news.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: James Ross <rem.jr@rem.webross.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Operating System
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 01:14:33 -0600
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <9r3b9usp7uh6iqar4jghkesabr229q9jaa@4ax.com>
References: <a6825a$75c$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3C88E0D1.89161C16@despammed.com>
 <a6m8h5$rpb$1@helle.btinternet.com> <a6nld6$i4n$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <jgo59u49ro74pbfvoek6ruqqa5o790mq90@4ax.com>
 <wcc8z8se0oe.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <v30a9usnp895obfnu6ef8t9h6nnn9fkp1r@4ax.com> <3C9514DD.9CF1F84A@san.rr.com>
 <99da9u0909rsblfdcc1ru7jd2r9q461qhk@4ax.com> <3C955E65.94268F80@san.rr.com>
 <5lqa9uctl2c0mal5jh4tfgn5q5u2gu2teo@4ax.com> <3C957742.8223A76B@san.rr.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21397
Date: 2002-03-18T01:14:33-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 05:12:47 GMT, Darren New <dnew@san.rr.com> wrote:

>You just have to worry about tables getting rearranged, or people
>storing configuration information in application-specific databases. :-)

Well...  you have a point!  Of course system structures / tables would
be protected and access allowed through a well defined API.  But even
if you did break the rules, the disorderly data would still be secure
because all the objects whose "created_by" field contained "your_app"
would have been backed up just before I issued the command Uninstall
your_app! :)   
JR