From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,31c0457c1c47fc2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-20 06:05:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn From: Robert*@ Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Have you ever had a bug caused by... Date: 20 Oct 2001 05:39:34 -0700 Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com] Message-ID: <9qrra601dr9@drn.newsguy.com> References: <27085883.0110191714.784d3d25@posting.google.com> <3BD0DD8D.E05F85BC@worldnet.att.net> <9qrfc30rvj@drn.newsguy.com> <9qrmjb$pft$1@wanadoo.fr> <87k7xqa6qz.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-288.newsdawg.com X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 2.90 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14966 Date: 2001-10-20T05:39:34-07:00 List-Id: In article <87k7xqa6qz.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk>, Matthew says... > >"Bertrand Augereau" writes: > >> I think gnatmake is compiler specific, so you can say that running the gnu >> preprocessor with flag -M would generate a Makefile for a set of C or C++ >> sources, which is almost equivalent. > >gnatmake is compiler specific, but the requirement to refuse to build >an executable from inconsistent parts is part of the language. > thank you, that is what I was about to say.