From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,874959b8413ac400 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-18 01:22:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!unlnews.unl.edu!newsfeed.ksu.edu!nntp.ksu.edu!news.okstate.edu!not-for-mail From: David Starner Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Book to learn GtkAda Date: 18 Oct 2001 06:43:49 GMT Organization: Oklahoma State University Message-ID: <9qltn5$7hu1@news.cis.okstate.edu> References: Reply-To: dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org NNTP-Posting-Host: x8b4e5643.dhcp.okstate.edu User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14863 Date: 2001-10-18T06:43:49+00:00 List-Id: On 17 Oct 2001 23:29:54 +0200, Michael Bode wrote: > Btw: Would it be possible and even make sense to create an Ada binding > for Qt? Sure. A direct binding to the C++ would highly GNAT-specific, though. (GTKAda is GNAT-specific, but the authors claim it would be easy to fix if anyone cares to.) The other problem would be the social problem, of creating enough users and developers to keep it up to date and complete. There's no technical reason why it can't be done, though, as far as I know. -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org "I saw a daemon stare into my face, and an angel touch my breast; each one softly calls my name . . . the daemon scares me less." - "Disciple", Stuart Davis