From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a50a3c40267219cc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-15 12:27:49 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: "Baugereau" <baugereau@wanadoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why not combine Ada and C++?
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:28:51 +0200
Organization: Wanadoo, l'internet avec France Telecom
Message-ID: <9qfdbk$lae$1@wanadoo.fr>
References: <3105e154.0110150021.32ff5426@posting.google.com>
Reply-To: "Baugereau" <baugereau@wanadoo.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: afontenayssb-103-1-4-85.abo.wanadoo.fr
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1003174068 21838 80.11.133.85 (15 Oct 2001 19:27:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Oct 2001 19:27:48 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14573
Date: 2001-10-15T19:27:48+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

It may seems stupid, but I think such a language would benefit from C++
postfix notation.
Object.Method () insteand of Method (Object)

Thus you can chain methods calls more clearly (1) and you can benefit from a
better completion from your IDE (2).
1) Object.Method1().Method2() instead of Method2 (Method1 (Object))
2) Object.Meth* gives only methods that apply to Object whereas Meth*
doesn't have this information

Maybe Ada people think this is a non-issue, though.