From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,18a1da27baade824 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-15 04:58:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!194.213.69.151!news.algonet.se!newsfeed1.telenordia.se!algonet!uab.ericsson.se!erix.ericsson.se!newstoo.ericsson.se!not-for-mail From: "Petter Fryklund" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A copy question.... Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:59:40 +0200 Organization: ericsson Message-ID: <9qehq6$t80$1@newstoo.ericsson.se> References: <9qedad$i1p$1@newstoo.ericsson.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.17.76.206 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14517 Date: 2001-10-15T13:59:40+02:00 List-Id: Wouldn't it be more efficient to let Int_Pointer point to an Array of Unsigned_32 and instead of looping just assign the value by means of: Array (0 .. 199) := Address_To_Int_Pointer (Address).all (0 .. 199);