From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-14 15:20:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn From: Robert*@ Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word Date: 14 Oct 2001 15:03:16 -0700 Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com] Message-ID: <9qd2340djj@drn.newsguy.com> References: <9q25ec0248o@drn.newsguy.com> <9q421v0bbg@drn.newsguy.com> <9q4d850163k@drn.newsguy.com> <3BC9F6CC.E41BE18A@nbi.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-874.newsdawg.com X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 2.90 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14492 Date: 2001-10-14T15:03:16-07:00 List-Id: In article <3BC9F6CC.E41BE18A@nbi.dk>, Jacob says... > >The object prefix notation has a very serious limitation, >which would actually break quite a few of my programs. Using >the object prefix notation, it is not possible to dispatch >on the function result type. > A simple example of what you mean?