From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c62a5e526aafd9d4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-12 19:22:39 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-xfer.siscom.net!newspump.sol.net!dfw-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!stl-feed.news.verio.net!newsreader.wustl.edu!unlnews.unl.edu!newsfeed.ksu.edu!nntp.ksu.edu!news.okstate.edu!not-for-mail
From: David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: The Hobby Lobby was Windows CE?
Date: 13 Oct 2001 01:43:19 GMT
Organization: Oklahoma State University
Message-ID: <9q867n$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu>
References: <mailman.1001142084.4963.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <9onhgu$9h9$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3BAF77E6.9BDE9102@adaworks.com>
 <9onvig$f6n$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3bb05ee7.10496763@news.demon.co.uk>
 <3BB0B3C4.432E2B4B@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
 <3bb1d07f.18201562@news.demon.co.uk>
 <3BB2075A.57C22F55@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
 <zYos7.6173$ev2.10872@www.newsranger.com>
 <3BB22F0E.718B1244@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
 <ajqs7.6294$ev2.11268@www.newsranger.com> <9otbs2$juj$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <RBrs7.6406$ev2.11556@www.newsranger.com> <9ovaf2$c18$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3BB340C6.DC51CB98@lmtas.lmco.com> <9ovh43$erd$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3BB49C07.D7F16D45@lmtas.lmco.com> <9p2bvl$ika$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <9p2iue$9281@news.cis.okstate.edu> <3BC75A22.FA507540@ebox.tninet.se>
Reply-To: dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: x8b4e5435.dhcp.okstate.edu
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14444
Date: 2001-10-13T01:43:19+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 23:01:22 +0200, Stefan Skoglund <stetson@ebox.tninet.se> wrote:
> If the different frontends need to be interoperable they
> must be based on the same backend i think ?

Why? The compilers just need to agree on ABIs. That's true in a lot of
cases with different backends. 

-- 
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I saw a daemon stare into my face, and an angel touch my breast; each 
one softly calls my name . . . the daemon scares me less."
- "Disciple", Stuart Davis