From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1cf653444208df72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-12 14:50:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn From: Vector..@ Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada vs. cpp Date: 12 Oct 2001 14:28:33 -0700 Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com] Message-ID: <9q7na102nqn@drn.newsguy.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: p-539.newsdawg.com X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 2.90 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14440 Date: 2001-10-12T14:28:33-07:00 List-Id: In article , whraven@usenet-access.com says... What is wrong with pthreads? Yes, it is not part of the language, but it is a standard (POSIX), and available in all platforms (except may on windows, I am not sure, but who cares about widnows anyway). So, simply do #include and you are all set. btw, I agree that having threads implemented in the language is better, but with pthreads around for C/C++ to use, this argument is not very strong.