From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1cf653444208df72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-09 08:35:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn From: Robert*@ Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada vs. cpp Date: 9 Oct 2001 08:10:30 -0700 Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com] Message-ID: <9pv4160n1o@drn.newsguy.com> References: <9pgr68$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <9phnic$9g5$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <5fkv7.134136$w7.19988807@news02.optonline.net> <9pmpk00a53@drn.newsguy.com> <9puvdc$225$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3BC30621.BDF74138@worldnet.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-086.newsdawg.com X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 2.90 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14038 Date: 2001-10-09T08:10:30-07:00 List-Id: In article <3BC30621.BDF74138@worldnet.att.net>, James says... > >I would, however, like to see some publicly available GC >implementations for Ada. Unless all Ada implementations provide GC (as an option), you will have broken Ada. Why? Becuase if I write an Ada program on a GC enabled compiler/run-time, and later on take the code and build on another Ada compiler/run-time which does not support GC, then my program will not work (opps, forgot to free my own memory, But I though the run-time will do it for me?) THis makes Ada source code much less portable across Ada systems.