"Pat Rogers" <progers@classwide.com> a �crit dans le message news: X4ku7.7990$Eq3.3697458203@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> > does this mean, that
> >
> > with a.b.c.d;
> >
> > is equivalent to
> >
> > with a;
> > with a.b;
> > with a.b.c;
> > with a.b.c.d;
>
> Yes, exactly right.
>
Note however that if you really want the child and not the parents, you can do the following:

with a.b.c.d;
package a_b_c_d renames a.b.c.d;

with a_b_c_d;
...

--
---------------------------------------------------------
           J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr