From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1a52c822fc0dbb23 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer1.kpn.DE!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Rational for not making cursor tagged in Containers Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <1a8y2vakorfhx.225uqh4hifpd$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177080147.5876.87.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1q1kx2jlcvnuj.ck0711mj4few$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177097829.26685.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <95wmj9goo6wc$.13f1j4dnadwws$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177349886.343834.295210@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1177373706.552914.71270@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1ccueevyp8oba.11c8wwyujtw1o$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177432057.705889.229690@n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1op3ml5q11aa$.vg0a2lyc9dpv$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177549092.325163.326870@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1ukuo9arhsjuu.1xhbhqzroadfz.dlg@40tude.net> <1szfxh3ov5lwz$.8x7y43lxxn24$.dlg@40tude.net> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:45:32 +0200 Message-ID: <9pkh1i0wvgy0$.po61hcswsl7r.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Apr 2007 10:45:14 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: c7dee402.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=4cG8Qf]UJd_@@RW1FjIB5Sic==]BZ:af^4Fo<]lROoRQFl8W>\BH3YRkoF<@50ADNUDNcfSJ;bb[UIRnRBaCd On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:31:41 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message > news:zp8f8yxaqal5.xmxbdrzopa73$.dlg@40tude.net... >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:37:34 +0200, Markus E Leypold wrote: > ... >>> We just have to assume that anybody knows when two >>> values are equal. >> >> And this is supposed to be the definition of? > > It's not quite that bad, but it is close; see 4.5.2(10): > > "For discrete types, the predefined relational operators are defined in > terms of corresponding mathematical operations on the position numbers of > the values of the operations." I.e. they are defined in terms of positions, not values, which works no longer we have these positions. > It surely has nothing to do with bit patterns, but rather the mathematical > meaning of those bit patterns. Sure, but we cannot compare meanings on a computer, we can bit patterns representing meanings. Assuming that different patterns correspond to different meanings (=injective mapping of), we could compare patterns as if they were meanings. > "Value" is one of the concepts that the RM does not try to define (which > doesn't help this discussion), although it uses the term a lot. We should not blame RM for that. I guess value is just a narrower word for meaning. So it just cannot be defined. > In such a > case, it is supposed to have the conventional meaning associated with the > term in English - so I don't think it is possible to completely settle > this... ;-) Ah, but what about making cursors tagged? (:-)) -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de