From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-04 23:35:39 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!pln-e!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
From: MM@MM <MM_member@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word "_pkg" be part of it?
Date: 4 Oct 2001 23:05:43 -0700
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com]
Message-ID: <9pjijn0pjg@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <9pif1o01btl@drn.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-327.newsdawg.com
X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 2.90
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13765
Date: 2001-10-04T23:05:43-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <9pif1o01btl@drn.newsguy.com>, mike@nospam says...
>
>i've seen some code where they write
>
>package foo_pkg is...
>
>
>i.e. the name of the package contains "pkg" or "package" in the name itself.
>
>this seems redundent to me, but may be not. what do folks think? 
>

with  foo.boo;

Now, boo need not be a package. it could be a subprogram, since subprograms
can be decalred as children of packages.

Probably not a common thing to do, but possible.