From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1143c4,7d107e452bdd8496 X-Google-Attributes: gid1143c4,public X-Google-Thread: 115aec,7d107e452bdd8496 X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1db77fbb2768946e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-02 11:00:38 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!xmission!nnrp.xmission!not-for-mail From: bgeer@xmission.xmission.com (bgeer) Newsgroups: linux.dev.kernel,comp.realtime,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is Linux right for Embedded? Date: 2 Oct 2001 12:00:23 -0600 Organization: XMission http://www.xmission.com/ Message-ID: <9pcvbn$r52$1@xmission.xmission.com> References: <3BB69F21.B5AA7451@intercom.com> <9p84tm$1ovg$1@news.cybercity.dk> <9pa0in$8bb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9pa9of$9me$1@xmission.xmission.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: xmission.xmission.com X-Trace: news.xmission.com 1002045635 5535 198.60.22.20 (2 Oct 2001 18:00:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@xmission.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Oct 2001 18:00:35 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com linux.dev.kernel:4245 comp.realtime:3927 comp.lang.ada:13634 Date: 2001-10-02T18:00:35+00:00 List-Id: "Pat Rogers" writes: >His point (if I may be so bold) is that they did it much more >economically in Ada. Other have seen these results too. Man hours, maybe, if you have a team that already has significant Ada experience. Include costs of compiler, language & tool training, development & emulation platforms, & future maintenance plus factor in employee turnover, may reveal a different economic interpretation. -- <> Robert Geer & Donna Tomky | |||| We sure |||| <> <> bgeer@xmission.com | == == find it == == <> <> dtomky@xmission.com | == == enchanting == == <> <> Albuquerque, NM USA | |||| here! |||| <>