From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6394e5e171f847d1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-05 23:48:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!158.43.192.22!join.news.pipex.net!pipex!cass.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.kvaerner.com!news@kvaerner.com From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada OS Kernel features Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:45:41 +0200 Organization: Kvaerner Group IT Message-ID: <9n762l$7ah4@news.kvaerner.com> References: <9n4euv$t9m$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <9n5n33$ke5$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <9n64cd$7mo$1@slb0.atl.mindspring.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 155.209.157.191 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2120.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12781 Date: 2001-09-06T08:45:41+02:00 List-Id: Brian Catlin wrote >Well, I wouldn't hold Mach up as the end-all or be-all of operating system >kernels; its performance is nothing to brag about. It certainly has many >interesting concepts, but its overhead is too high for my taste (I haven't >looked at it in several years, so it may have been cleaned up; I'll have to go >check it out again). As I recall Mach is supposed to represent a snapshot of microkernel technology at a relative early stage. I believe that at least IBM has advanced the state of the art considerably since mach was released. Greetings,