From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bcf30769d6d9599 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-27 13:37:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!unlnews.unl.edu!newsfeed.ksu.edu!nntp.ksu.edu!news.okstate.edu!not-for-mail From: David Starner Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA os talk Date: 27 Aug 2001 19:24:52 GMT Organization: Oklahoma State University Message-ID: <9me6q4$aai1@news.cis.okstate.edu> References: <9mdmck$rs1$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Reply-To: dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org NNTP-Posting-Host: x8b4e5129.dhcp.okstate.edu User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12488 Date: 2001-08-27T19:24:52+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:44:35 -0400, Marin David Condic wrote: > Make > sure that it can handle a variety of scheduling algorithms so that it might > be made suitable for realtime or non-realtime programming. Are there any good examples of desktop OS's with good realtime capabilities? Hybrids always show favortism towards one side or the other, sometimes to the point of unusability to the stepchild. You know, if anyone of us were really serious about this, we probably could have taken the time wasted in this thread and actually wrote some code, or at least some detailed design outlines. -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org "I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg