From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,58988230753075de
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-27 12:00:00 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-was.dfn.de!znr.news.ans.net!news.chips.ibm.com!newsfeed.btv.ibm.com!news.btv.ibm.com!not-for-mail
From: pontius@btv.MBI.com.invalid (Dale Pontius)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: In praise of Ada Freeware
Date: 27 Aug 2001 18:59:58 GMT
Organization: IBM Global Services North -- Burlington, Vermont, USA
Message-ID: <9me5be$q2k$1@news.btv.ibm.com>
References: <my6BKStAaXFs@eisner.encompasserve.org>
    <9kent0$ivo$2@news.btv.ibm.com>
    <5ee5b646.0108031815.599ecf37@posting.google.com>
    <YXxb7.351$NJ6.884@www.newsranger.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kimon.btv.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.btv.ibm.com 998938798 26708 9.61.131.227 (27 Aug 2001 18:59:58
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@btv.ibm.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Aug 2001 18:59:58 GMT
X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.0
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12481
Date: 2001-08-27T18:59:58+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <YXxb7.351$NJ6.884@www.newsranger.com>,
        Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes:
> In article <5ee5b646.0108031815.599ecf37@posting.google.com>, Robert Dewar
> says...
>>
>>But this issue has been hotted up recently by Microsoft and Wind River
>>who have strongly favored the BSD license over the GPL, partly
>>because they want to use Free Software developed by others in their
>>own proprietary products.
>
> That's very interesting considering that, as near as I can tell, Wind River's
> entire business is built upon a foundation GPL'ed software. The version of
> Tornado I have uses both gcc and a customized gnu make.
>
There's an interesting perspective one can take with respect to the
GPL, from a corporate perspective:

First off, nobody is an island, even corporations. Even if you buy a
lot of software, and are not a software company yourself, chances are
you still have a lot of custom software running around in-house. Even
more, SOME of this in-house software may be of interest to others,
and may help sell whatever you make as your core product/service.

THIS is the stuff that it makes sense to put under GPL. You don't
want to become responsible for it in the same way that you are for
for-sale products, yet you'd like to see it out there. At the worst,
it is a complete no-op to your bottom line. Even better, it may help
sell products that are on your bottom line. Better yet, it may also
devalue a competitor's product line by making free competition for
their for-sale product, (This is more likely if you're a niche
player and they are more diversified.) leaving you slightly stronger
in the areas where you are head-to-head.

Dale Pontius
NOT speaking for IBM