From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107f24,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid107f24,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-22 05:35:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.102.229.162!not-for-mail From: "Joachim Durchholz" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.functional Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of service attack. Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:34:54 +0200 Message-ID: <9m08tm$bsbo3$1@ID-9852.news.dfncis.de> References: <3B6555ED.9B0B0420@sneakemail.com> <87n15lxzzv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <3B672322.B5EA1B66@home.com> <4a885870.0108112341.7ce02ac0@posting.google.com> <3B834E5D.B0D26AB1@adaworks.com> <9lvsic$bet9s$1@ID-9852.news.dfncis.de> <9m0193$grs$1@bird.wu-wien.ac.at> Reply-To: "Joachim Durchholz" NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.102.229.162 X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 998483702 12463875 212.102.229.162 (16 [9852]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12217 comp.lang.c:76093 comp.lang.c++:84805 comp.lang.functional:7615 Date: 2001-08-22T14:34:54+02:00 List-Id: Markus Mottl wrote: > In comp.lang.functional Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Could you share a reference to a report? > > Here is a somewhat longer treatment of the case: > > http://www.jerrypournelle.com/reports/jerryp/Yorktown.html > > In short: a divide-by-zero in a database caused a Windows NT server to > crash, paralyzing the whole computer network on the cruiser Yorktown > for more than two hours. > > As usual, official reports (i.e. by the Navy itself) that indicate > shortcomings of their weapon technology do not circulate for too long > for obvious reasons (but maybe they are just hidden well enough). Hmm. Looks as if NT wasn't really responsible, the thing was still under test. Regards, Joachim -- This is not an official statement from my employer.