From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bba87bb831d869b6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-16 01:33:32 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!not-for-mail
From: Reinert Korsnes <Reinert.Korsnes@ffi.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Make C++ via Ada95/Gnat ?
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:30:41 +0200
Organization: UNINETT news service
Message-ID: <9lg0gs$9dv$1@snipp.uninett.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sthrkou.ffi.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: snipp.uninett.no 997950812 9663 193.156.99.159 (16 Aug 2001 08:33:32
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@uninett.no
User-Agent: KNode/0.4
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11973
Date: 2001-08-16T10:30:41+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi,

Is it possible/practical to produce C++ code by first making Ada95 code
and then from this produce C++ (via Gnat) ?  Just a bad idea ?

(I would prefer to make/test Ada95 code rather than C++)

reinert

-- 
http://home.chello.no/~rkorsnes