From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107f24,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid107f24,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-08 07:12:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!not-for-mail From: cross@augusta.math.psu.edu (Dan Cross) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.functional Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of service attack. Date: 8 Aug 2001 10:12:50 -0400 Organization: Mememememememmeme Message-ID: <9krhd2$6po@augusta.math.psu.edu> References: <9kpo9r$415@augusta.math.psu.edu> <5drpk9.l0e.ln@10.0.0.2> NNTP-Posting-Host: augusta.math.psu.edu X-Trace: boatanchor.ems.psu.edu 997279971 10526 146.186.132.2 (8 Aug 2001 14:12:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: security@psu.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Aug 2001 14:12:51 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11612 comp.lang.c:72913 comp.lang.c++:80957 comp.lang.functional:7409 Date: 2001-08-08T14:12:51+00:00 List-Id: In article <5drpk9.l0e.ln@10.0.0.2>, wrote: >Which point? The point that those desktop components could and should be built to a higher level of quality than they currently are, perhaps using better tools. If all you want to do is perpetuate the status quo, then by all means continue doing what you're doing. - Dan C.