From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-27 09:54:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "is ada dead?" A challenge for all of us? Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:50:12 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: <9js64t$7va$05$1@news.t-online.com> References: <3B550073@MailAndNews.com> Reply-To: JeLlyFish.software@gmx.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 996252637 05 8170 pbVmSqWSS+aiWH 010727 16:50:37 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 777000109768-0001@t-dialin.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10642 Date: 2001-07-27T18:50:12+02:00 List-Id: Barry Kelly wrote: >Delphi doesn't use project files for individual applications - the >project file is the main "program ; uses ; ... >begin ... end." bit. Yes, true, but at least they call it so. Delphi Project File. >The command line compiler hardly ever needs a makefile either - just >pass it the main filename and make sure all units are either in the >same directory or on the unit search path in dcc32.cfg. How to tell the compiler that it has to compile the DLL before it can run the test program that uses this DLL? If I compiled the DLL Delphi complained about a missing target application, if I compiled the test program, the test program either complained about the missing DLL or it used an old version. Classical deadlock, I'd say. ;) >Maybe it's a lack of experience? Surely. That's why I complained about it. :) Vinzent.