From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-26 06:19:40 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail
From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Java portability
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:19:40 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: GMUGHDU
Message-ID: <9jp5dc$e2b$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
References: <mailman.995648003.8404.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <%cR67.1385$mz6.4505748@nnrp3.proxad.net>
 <9jgopl$5v6$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>
 <lpS67.1427$OA6.4515044@nnrp3.proxad.net>
 <9jh2cs$aon$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>
 <2sU67.1485$di7.4670499@nnrp3.proxad.net>
 <9jhb8u$g3s$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> <3B5C4A92.647FC2EC@earthlink.net>
 <2bb77.5186$DL4.5097616@nnrp5.proxad.net> <3B5D5B79.F2DC527E@earthlink.net>
 <Zse77.5300$v_4.5185683@nnrp5.proxad.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de
X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 996153580 14411 134.91.4.34 (26 Jul 2001
 13:19:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:19:40 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00
 (9000/800))
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10594
Date: 2001-07-26T13:19:40+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

nicolas <n.brunot@cadwin.com> wrote:
: "Marc A. Criley" <mcqada@earthlink.net> a ?crit dans le message news:
: 3B5D5B79.F2DC527E@earthlink.net...
: 
:> I'm nearly certain that each vendor has their own means of interfacing
:> to the Java libraries.  I've not looked at the specifics of how AdaMagic
:> does it, but I know that JGNAT added Java-specific pragmas to support
:> interfacing.
: 
: Unfortunetaly that's exactly what should be avoided.

Well, what can you do? Does your company do some lobbying
to get this standardized?
Besides, methinks we all should be using DWIM :-)