From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00,
	XPRIO autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b74ec64483660e21,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-23 14:18:41 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!psiuk-p2!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: "Marin David Condic" <marin.condic.auntie.spam@pacemicro.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: When to use 'Class in a parameter list
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:27:14 -0400
Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc
Message-ID: <9ji1b3$4pi$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.170.200.133
X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 995920035 4914 136.170.200.133 (23 Jul 2001 20:27:15
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@pace.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Jul 2001 20:27:15 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10482
Date: 2001-07-23T20:27:15+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

O.K. Here's something I thought I understood but given behavior of some code
I have, now I'm questioning what is happening.

If I have a tagged type "Base_Type" that has an operation on it, called "Op"
and I derive a new type called "Child_Type" that does not require changes to
"Op", do I make the parameter Base_Type or Base_Type'Class? (My
understanding was that I could make it Base_Type, but then calls to it with
a Child_Type would require explicit type conversion. Making it 'Class would
accept anything of that class without conversion. Apparently the compiler is
swollowing it without type conversion - which is now confusing me.)

In code:

procedure Op (Base : in out Base_Type) ;
...
X : Child_Type ;
...
Op (X) ; --  Why is this working without a Base_Type (X) conversion???

So unless I'm doing something strange that is causing some corner-case to
come up, I'm now wondering why I would need Base_Type'Class as a parameter
type? I was under the impression that I would use 'Class if I wanted to make
an operation that worked on anything derived from the class without explicit
conversion. (Possible to override it in a child class, AFAIK...)

My understanding of when to *NOT* use the 'Class was if I was building an
operation I expected to override (possibly calling the parent operation
within it - using a type conversion). So when it is not overriden, and
control goes to the parent op without an explicit conversion, then when do
you need the 'Class? I must be missing something here......(I need to do
this sort of thing more often - it all evaporates if you don't use it!!!)

MDC
--
Marin David Condic
Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology Americas    www.pacemicro.com
Enabling the digital revolution
e-Mail:    marin.condic@pacemicro.com
Web:      http://www.mcondic.com/