From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3cc0519bd709d56 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.0.170 with SMTP id 10mr10499541pbf.2.1322204289487; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:58:09 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni15556pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Niklas Holsti Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Standards Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:58:07 +0100 Organization: Tidorum Ltd Message-ID: <9j8sjvFfjuU2@mid.individual.net> References: <5994234.589.1322191928216.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqli7> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net JaLFp0U9dgk131bp4oYVdwujzi7eWKQHhGSKgV/D4aawjY/Io+ Cancel-Lock: sha1:YOL96RobYKe2q4X4IqDABWqyPos= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <5994234.589.1322191928216.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqli7> Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19141 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2011-11-25T07:58:07+01:00 List-Id: On 11-11-25 04:32 , Rego, P. wrote: > How are published the new Ada Standards? I mean, when looking for some questions here in forum I read some posts where some people talk (at least looked to me) very fluently about new features for Ada 2012 and even for Ada 2020, as if they were defined from long ago. I guess WG9 don't have so many people or I have missed something. > > Ok, Adacore has just released a GNATPRO previous version which includes some features of Ada 2012, and reading the release notes made me learn a little about these new features. AUJ and Ada Europe Conf always get some news too and I also read the John Barnes introduction for the Ada 2012 rationale. But sometimes I cannot distinguish if people talk about suggested/desired features (as if they were to be implemented) or if they talk about decided/published features by WG9/ISO. > > Maybe is there a draft of ARM2012 available? http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/ada12.html -- Niklas Holsti Tidorum Ltd niklas holsti tidorum fi . @ .