From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,53611649a57c674a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-19 09:13:26 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.125.52.117!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Jeltsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GUI toolkit for Ada again (Java with jgnat?) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:14:49 +0200 Message-ID: <9j70v4$m9mub$2@ID-77306.news.dfncis.de> References: <9hqhm7$f3u2r$1@ID-77306.news.dfncis.de> <3B504975.7B63C6FB@worldnet.att.net> <9iq1sj$k8abb$2@ID-77306.news.dfncis.de> <3B5095CC.99BB1BF7@worldnet.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.125.52.117 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 995559205 23387083 212.125.52.117 (16 [77306]) User-Agent: KNode/0.4 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10254 Date: 2001-07-19T18:14:49+02:00 List-Id: Hello, > [...] > Every application will get a new look and feel only if they are > compiled with shared or dynamically linked libraries. Those compiled > with statically linked libraries will not be updated. Yes, you are right. > Historically, changing shared libraries does not always work as > cleanly as one would hope. The reason is that sometimes the changes > include changes in the interfaces to the subprograms in the > libraries. If such a change was made to the "native" libraries then > the existing applications could stop working altogether. Ok, new versions would have to be strictly interface compatible with the older ones. > For practical purposes it would be very difficult to change the > behavior of existing "native" libraries. There is too much user > inertia. The main area I thought of when talking about changes of implementation and behaviour was Microsoft Windows. There you have in fact such changes with every new version of the OS. The interfaces are more or less compatible. > Jim Rogers > Colorado Springs, Colorado USA Wolfgang Jeltsch Cottbus, Germany